Comments on: Crunch

By: PrdQueen

PrdQueen — Sun, 09 Jan 2011 11:19:51 +0000

Screw all of you, the Predator is the best!
You could se in Predator 2 he was 1 and a half metres away when he got shot with bullets the size of my thumb. Aliens, however, would die if that happens. And Predators are smarter. Aliens act on instinct, while Predators are very intellegent. It is their honour that makes them so bold when they hunt.

I counter-act your nediness with my own brand of Kick-Ass Logic.

(.)_(.)

By: Weasel

Weasel — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 02:51:26 +0000

Xeno.Morph wrote:

Thank you Captain Obvious.

Just doin’ my job, citizen. Captain Obvious, away!

By: Socran

Socran — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:42:47 +0000

Ravager and… No, I’m talking about the computer ones. In particular, AvP2′s plot was helped along with Giger’s making sure the Xenomorph anatomy and social structure was correctly implied. And by locked up, I mean in chains like the queen in the AvP movie. Whatever game you may have played that had a “ravager” is definitely not what I’m talking about.

Trust me, I check my sources. I’ve sorted through a lot of bull trying to figure these guys out.

By: Warrior Alien

Warrior Alien — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:37:50 +0000

Okay somethin’ ain’t right…I logged in on the forums BEFORE posting so the above statement SHOULD show I’m logged in….I’ll figure it out someday

OH YEAH…NOW it works

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:33:55 +0000

Actually Xeno could be right, and the movies be wrong about exhibiting Alien’s real strength. For instance…insects with exoskeletons, such as the simple ant, can carry up to ten times its own body weight. Considering Alien is pretty much an enormous insect with an exoskeleton and a whole lotta drool…why can’t they be that strong? Well, maybe the producers of the movie just chose not to show just how strong they really should be and instead made them weaker in exchange for their endoskeleton (Predator 2 Alien skull). Besides what fun would it be if Aliens were THAT strong, there would be no fight, no real victories, and no possible chance of human survival . [/u]

By: one ugly muthafugga

one ugly muthafugga — Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:53:37 +0000

Quote:
exo is for exponential and the terminator does not have his skeleton out of his body but inside.

…..someone doesn’t know what “exponential” means…..

By: RobinHood3000

RobinHood3000 — Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:21:27 +0000

What’s this about the AvP movie being inaccurate? I feel a debate coming on…

By: presdon_is_cool

presdon_is_cool — Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:35:42 +0000

is it?

By: Guest

Guest — Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:23:20 +0000

Anonymous wrote:

my own greatest fan wrote:
…exo is for exponential…

Hehe…..Uuummmm….you sure ’bout dat fella?

actually yes i am. exo comes from latin and exponential is a modified version of exo changed into the english.

By: Xeno.Morph

Xeno.Morph — Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:15:51 +0000

Socran wrote:
I’m pretty sure that in the AvP games (which I hear have been dubbed canon by Giger himself) they said something about Xenomorphs merely not becoming Queens/Praetorians because of pheromones given off by those that are already born. This is not only an excuse as to why that single Xeno inside Ripley was a Queen, it implies that the Queen in Aliens was already there during the first movie. Chances are, it was locked up in the same way as the Queen from the AvP movie, and the drones that infested the colonists released her.

AHAHAHAHAA! You just made me laugh harder than usual when I laugh at stupidity. Okay. So. The queen in the MOVIES was NEVER locked up! You just didn’t see her! Der! And in the avp games, they added a “Carrier” and a “Ravager” just because they wanted more money. I don’t count them as “real” in the sense of the franchise….